The Blind Spot. Borderline Questions of Historical Semantics between Reinhart Koselleck and Niklas Luhmann

Authors

  • Maurizio Merlo University of Padua

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1825-9618/6619

Keywords:

Conceptual History, Koselleck, Luhmann, Derrida, Semantics, Différance.

Abstract

In the wide critical reviews that the enterprise of Begriffsgeschichte has triggered, the difficult relationship that conceptual history – in its Koselleckian declination – entertains with systemic theory has remained maybe underexposed until now. Moving from the tension between experience and historicity in Koselleck, the article reflects on the tensions that the historical-conceptual structure reveals as soon as it comes into contact with the problems of historical semantics that accompany the Luhmannian attempt of operating, in the register of second order observation, a temporal dislocation and a de-paradoxification of the paradox activated by Derrida’s différance, as constitutive of historicity. The blind spot at the bottom of Luhmannian gaze cuts out the borders of the “history” continent along the lines of the shipwreck of the classic semantics of modernity.

 

Published

2016-12-31

How to Cite

Merlo, M. (2016). The Blind Spot. Borderline Questions of Historical Semantics between Reinhart Koselleck and Niklas Luhmann. Scienza & Politica. Per Una Storia Delle Dottrine, 28(55). https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1825-9618/6619

Issue

Section

Articles